Friday, 21 January 2011 06:37

the SUN series: Article # 1: Tailoring Your Message to the Audience

Written by 
[The following is the first article in a series as published in the business section of the Vancouver Sun. For context, see the intro to this series here]

Proper Communication Key to Job Success

Ever wondered why some leaders inspire or why some people always get the job they interview for? Much of it comes down to communication.

Whether you're a career executive or in career transition, strategic communication skills are essential. As a rule, all skilled communicators adapt their message to the audience. Many do this instinctively, but strategic communication can be learned.

different languagesThere are four dominant communication styles in the contemporary workplace: the Expert, the Achiever, the Communitarian and the Holist. Each style uses and responds to different language.

Experts think and speak in terms of right and wrong. They are linear, logical and precise. When communicating with an Expert, speak in clear, concrete language.

Achievers are action- and results-oriented. When communicating with an Achiever, use strong and bold language that appeals to their competitive nature.

Communitarians value teamwork and inclusion. Speak to them about shared vision and co-ordinated efforts.

The Holist is interested in the big picture and how the pieces fit together. They connect ideas and look toward the future. They respond to conceptual, analytical exchanges.

So how do you recognize each type? First, pay attention to how your counter-party responds to questions and situations. The words someone uses tend to reveal how they think and what they value. Accurately identifying communication types allows you to better tailor your message.

When interviewing for a new job or meeting a new client, gather essential information. The industry, department and position a person works in can help you narrow down their style. A sales professional for a hedge fund will likely speak like an Achiever, for example.

Great leaders communicate across all styles. They speak with the vision of the Holist, the shared purpose of the Communitarian, the action of the Achiever and with the responsibility of an Expert. Or in the words of Nelson Mandela "If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his language, that goes to his heart."

Strategic communication is a skill that can be learned and refined once you understand the different expectations of your audience.

Join the Discussion

Commenting Policy

Beams and Struts employs commenting guidelines that we expect all readers to bear in mind when commenting at the site. Please take a moment to read them before posting - Beams and Struts Commenting Policy

3 comments

  • Comment Link chela Saturday, 22 January 2011 06:49 posted by chela

    Just curious about the background of each of these communication styles and if they are related to (or if I am reading through my own filter of) orientation through the four quadrants?
    Achiever UR
    Expert UL
    Communitarians LL
    Holist LR

  • Comment Link Chris Dierkes Saturday, 22 January 2011 19:08 posted by Chris Dierkes

    Chela,

    I think these are generally described as stages (in ascending order of complexity). But I like the idea of incorporating quadrants. I think it fleshes out Juma's idea that the post-holist stage (left unnamed but described) is the one that incorporates all of them.

  • Comment Link Juma Wood Friday, 28 January 2011 04:27 posted by Juma Wood

    Hi Chela,

    Every generalized conception such as this is at once awkward, right and wrong. I do consider these a stage conception in that there are ascending levels of complexity and perspectives. That said, depending upon the task at hand, I might want the narrow scope and concrete language of the Expert.

    While I introduce them as types, and they are, the quadrant analysis you give I'd say falls more properly under the category of styles and I don't think this conception divides neatly enough to put them in quadrants. That would be another article.

    Styles and stages can be subtle things. The article I just posted on leadership styles can also be organized in a stage conception. This is why, I believe, holding mental images of rigid stages is both incorrect and unhelpful. The term 'waves' has often been used, and that sounds more accurate. I think of them as interior systems to be activated with discernment and skill.

Login to post comments

Search Beams

Newest Discussions

Twitter

Loading...

Last 10 tweets from beamsandstruts:

People talking about '@beamsandstruts':