The Difference It'd Make to Eat Local Food Once a Week

Written by 

authors and food of Animal Vegetable MiracleThe following is a short excerpt from Animal Vegetable Miracle: A Year of Food Life, by Barbara Kingsolver (co-written by her husband Steven L Hopp and her daughter Camille Kingsolver). Kingsolver and family moved to a farm in rural Virginia, and commited themselves to a year of eating locally and seasonally, and, whenever possible, restricting themselves to food they've grown or raised themselves. Barbara Kingsolver, with the prose style, insights into human nature and ability relate unfolding events in a fascinating way that has made her an acclaimed and best-selling novelist, tells the story of what they planted, which animals they raised, how they cooked, what food rituals they followed and her thoughts on the subject of our relationship with what we eat. Camille, a 19 year old college student and yoga instructor, gives her perspective on their year-long project, and food in general. Steven L. Hopp, university professor of Environmental Studies, provides sidebars. What follows is one of them. 

animal vegetable miracle book coverFor anyone interested in the ramfications of our food culture, for anyone who liked The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food, for anyone who... eats, I couldn't recommend this book more highly. 

It's full of recipes, too. 

Americans put almost as much fossil fuel into our refrigerators as our cars. We're consuming about 400 gallons of oil a year per citizen - about 17 percent of our nation's energy use - for agriculture, a close second to our vehicular use. Tractors, combines, harvesters, irrigation, sprayers, tillers, balers, and other equipment all use petroleum. Even bigger gas guzzlers on the farm are not the machines, but so-called inputs. Synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides use oil and natural gas as their starting materials, and in their manufacturing. More than a quarter of all farming energy goes into synthetic fertilizers.

But getting the crop from seed to harvest takes only one-fifth of the total oil used for our food. The lion's share is consumed during the trip from the farm to your plate. Each food item in a typical US meal has traveled an average of 1500 miles. In addition to direct transport, other fuel-thirsty steps include processing (drying, milling, cutting, sorting, baking), packaging, warehousing, and refrigeration. Energy calories consumed by production, packaging, and shipping far outweigh the energy calories we receive from food.

A quick way to improve food-related fuel economy would be to buy a quart of motor oil and drink it. More palatable options are available. If every US citizen ate just one meal a week (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we would reduce our country's oil consumption by over 1.1 million barrels of oil every week. That's not gallons, but barrels. Small changes in buying habits can make big differences. Becoming a less energy-dependent nation may just need to start with a good breakfast.

Related items

Join the Discussion

Commenting Policy

Beams and Struts employs commenting guidelines that we expect all readers to bear in mind when commenting at the site. Please take a moment to read them before posting - Beams and Struts Commenting Policy

6 comments

  • Comment Link Matt Lewis Monday, 12 September 2011 23:58 posted by Matt Lewis

    Thanks for this TJ. As one who has enjoyed the books you've mentioned here, I will give this one a go too. I have a criticism of the sidebar presented here though.

    When I see author(s) discussing how to affect energy consumption I often pause to consider what is being said. Is it valuable to consider the impacts on energy use of changing one aspect of behavior without comparing it to other potential changes? For instance, in terms of reduced energy use, how does eating as a locavore one meal a week compare to riding your bicycle to work one day of the week? Or taking the bus? Although 1.1 million barrels a week sounds impressive, it's an isolated statistic without a benchmark and therefore somewhat meaningless. I think it's presented as more of a tonic for people who would already be inclined to eat as a locavore than as a compelling reason to outright take up locavorism.

    Even if numbers were available to make comparisons, I feel like I get lost in the analysis sometimes. I once took a few minutes and seriously considered whether I should buy frozen OJ concentrate or fresh OJ strictly on energy used in production. Is that something worth thinking about? I doubt it. And locavorism would suggest neither is the best option! But I do like a tall glass of Orange Juice...

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Tuesday, 13 September 2011 21:09 posted by TJ Dawe

    Matt, thanks for this insight.

    you're right - being able to compare energy consumption for various aspects of behaviour would enrich the reader's understanding further. But I think the great value in presenting the information as it is - albeit incomplete - is to shine a light on the fact that great amounts of energy are used to transport and process our food. And the vast majority us, I'd say, are distanced enough from what we eat that we rarely if ever consider this.

    And I think there's value in providing a tonic for anyone predisposed to consider locavorism. Plenty of people are fence-sitters. A big-picture illustration like this reminds us that our choices are important. And looking further into issues increases our knowledge. Pretty much every sidebar in the book ends with a web address or two.

    Extreme locavores would indeed suggest foregoing that glass of orange juice, unless you live in a region that grows oranges. I don't intend to stop eating grapefruits, but it does help me to understand which things I buy come with a higher hidden price tag which we'll all have to pay eventually, as a species. Perhaps it's appropriate that certain foods cost more, and consequently be thought of as treats, rather than as staples.

  • Comment Link Trish Shannon Wednesday, 14 September 2011 21:45 posted by Trish Shannon

    You can improve these numbers by not only buying local, but buying further down on the food chain. That is, the less packaging and production, the less energy. It's also cheaper.

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Wednesday, 14 September 2011 22:59 posted by TJ Dawe

    Most certainly. And unprocessed food is better for you. And food made from basic ingredients tastes better. And local food that's unprocessed and in season... can't beat that.

    My girlfriend recently made tomato sauce from fresh tomatoes, garlic and basil leaves clipped from a plant on our windowsill. Unbelievably delicious.

    It's easier to make things from basic ingredients than most people realize. In Animal Vegetable Miracle, Kingsolver even describes how easy it is to make cheese. Takes her about an hour.

  • Comment Link Sarah Olson Wednesday, 21 September 2011 14:31 posted by Sarah Olson

    I couldn't agree more with this impulse, it is so good, on so many different levels - many of which have already been mentioned (environmental/social responsibility, taste, health).

    The wonderful thing about the increase of non-industrial food production that we are seeing is that is it becoming really easy to eat locally. All produce is labelled as to where it was grown and larger grocery stores are increasingly carrying local foods. In addition of course are seasonal farmer's markets, which have the additional benefit of allowing you to look the person in the eye who grew and nurtured your food. This is an intangible benefit, but for me makes me feel more connected to where my food came from.

    I've personally gotten really into a weekly produce box delivery - (we use SPUD - www.spud.ca) so nearly all our food comes from around here and we're able to eat in season all year round (lots of pears, squash and mushrooms in the winter mind you). They sell much more than produce and I've enjoyed the added benefit of making fewer trips to the grocery store!

    So thanks for sharing this TJ. It's wonderful that so many of us are excited about taking back our right/privilege to healthy , sustainable (and delicious!) ways of feeding ourselves.

  • Comment Link Trevor Malkinson Wednesday, 21 September 2011 21:31 posted by Trevor Malkinson

    I'm in strong agreement with the quote in the article and to much of what's been said here. The industrial food supply is disastrous and unsustainable on multiple levels. Here's the trailer for a new documentary called 'Taste the Waste' on the waste in that food supply:

    http://tastethewaste.com/info/film

    And here's a passage from Michael Pollan's now seminal article 'Farmer in Chief', a personal address to President Obama when he took office:

    "After cars, the food system uses more fossil fuel than any other sector of the economy — 19 percent. And while the experts disagree about the exact amount, the way we feed ourselves contributes more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere than anything else we do — as much as 37 percent, according to one study. Whenever farmers clear land for crops and till the soil, large quantities of carbon are released into the air. But the 20th-century industrialization of agriculture has increased the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the food system by an order of magnitude; chemical fertilizers (made from natural gas), pesticides (made from petroleum), farm machinery, modern food processing and packaging and transportation have together transformed a system that in 1940 produced 2.3 calories of food energy for every calorie of fossil-fuel energy it used into one that now takes 10 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce a single calorie of modern supermarket food. Put another way, when we eat from the industrial-food system, we are eating oil and spewing greenhouse gases. This state of affairs appears all the more absurd when you recall that every calorie we eat is ultimately the product of photosynthesis — a process based on making food energy from sunshine. There is hope and possibility in that simple fact".

    http://michaelpollan.com/articles-archive/farmer-in-chief/

Login to post comments

Search Beams

Most Popular Discussions