Living Under Water

Written by 

amsHello, my name is Tineke de Boer and I’m from Holland. Well, who cares where I'm from these days? Aren't we all part of one global culture, one consciousness connected through this wonderful media we have at hand now? I don't know where in the world you are when reading this, but I’m sure you’ve been watching the same Disney movies as a kid, you love your Macbook just the way I do, and when we meet, we'll talk about things like the Occupy movement. It's the reason I can type this article fully confident you can relate. We are probably quite similar.

It doesn't seem to matter anymore where you're from within the postmodern Western world, we all understand each other and share many of the same likes and dislikes. The fact that I’m Dutch just adds superficial and quirky differences - like the fact I love cheese, think it’s fine to smoke joints anywhere, and am not shocked by nudity on TV. But is it actually true? Has place indeed lost its meaning, its impact on our ways of being, our view on the world? I've found that it's not so, as I'll explain in this article. Because I've been born and raised in Holland I do see the world very differently than you. Picture_1But I haven't been that aware of it until now. And you can be sure that your being Canadian, American, German, Norwegian, or whatever, definitely shapes your consciousness in deeper and more important ways than you may be aware of.

In this article I'd love to take you with me on a discovery of my own cultural lens, and try to show how we’re all probably more deeply embedded in our own cultures than we’re aware of. Who knows, maybe it’ll inspire a closer look into your own consciousness and the history of your country to find how you're connected to your motherland. 

The outside perspective of visitors to Holland

It's a rainy afternoon in Amsterdam and I’m walking through the crowded wet streets of the old city centre with its crooked houses built centuries ago. I notice a group of elderly American tourists. How do I know they're tourists and how can I see where they are from? Well, nobody here dares to walk around in such white sneakers seemingly purchased specifically for this occasion. Only white Americans. I laugh to myself, how easy to tell the differences! I overhear them musing about how large parts of Holland lie below sea level; it seems to freak them out. How do these Dutch live here so quietly and undisturbed while they're living in a bathtub, the roaring sea kept at bay with a few high piles of mud!?

I shrug, it's such a normal part of life for me. In the Netherlands, a small country in the north of Europe, 60% of the population lives below sea level (for those counting that’s about 10 million people!). Large dikes prevent the country from flooding. I myself was born in a Dutch town that lies more than two metres below sea level, in an area pumped dry by monks back in 1631. Many generations have lived in the 'Low Countries' ever since. We don't really worry about drowning, especially after the government built the impressive Deltaworks, a set of large dams which were a response to the huge flood of 1953 (video). This system has indeed kept us dry for over half a century. The result? We don't really seem to be afraid of the water anymore, or even aware of it.

Picture_2

'The Deltaworks'

The Americans made me think

Picture_3But those curious tourists got me thinking as their conversations gave me a bit of space from my own cultural perspective. Maybe it's not as 'normal' to live below sea level as I think it is. What does it actually mean? Wouldn't it be healthy to have some sort of fear or wariness that one of the most prosperous and developed countries in Europe can be washed away when the moon and the sea agree, and the wind joins the party?

After overhearing the American tourists I started to take note of articles in the newspaper about the dikes and the dangers of living under water. I found reports about the height and quality of the dikes, warning that they won't hold when mother nature gets frisky. And we all know what’ll happen then: think of New Orleans after the short but intense visit of Mrs. Katrina, or think of Bangladesh after yet another heavy rainseason. Still there is no public upheaval or sense of unsafety in Holland. Just recently the 'Hoogheemraadschap', the national institution responsible for water maintenance, launched an awareness campaign, showing people how low under sea level they actually live. Living under water has become so abstract we need an awareness campaign to remember!

Picture_4

Image from a Dutch awareness campaign, the caption reads: 'Farmer Schagen from the Beemster is living 4.4 meters under sea level. Living safely under sealevel is less normal than you think'

Taking the outside perspective – travelling to the Rocky Mountains

After overhearing the American perspective on living in the Netherlands, I had a chance to travel to the US and attend a retreat in Colorado. Getting out of my own country, meditating for hours on end, and being exposed to a new geographical landscape helped me see my own cultural lens more clearly that I ever had before. Let me explain why!

Remember, I was born in a 'swampland', as my cheeky Canadian partner likes to call my home country. I’ve lived behind a dike my whole life. I’ve heard the stories of the terrible floods, the back-breaking labour of building dikes and pumping the water out. The sea is never far away in Holland. Water all around. So imagine travelling to the Rocky Mountains, Colorado. I was suddenly in the middle of a huge landmass, surrounded by mountains and not the green Dutch flatlands. No water to be found, it was so dry my skin was starting to chap. I wasn’t used to the low humidity up in the mountains. I even started to get a bit anxious to recognize there was no water around me. I never realized that the brooks, puddles and sea were such an orientation point for me.

colorado_mountainholland_country

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In these surroundings I started meditating deeply, in a huge tent that was moving, cracking and shrieking whenever the strong wind would blow. One dark night I was in meditation and the wind was blowing especially hard. It was a full-blown storm and rain was pouring down. The huge tent barely stayed on the ground, the only thing it seemed to want to do was to lift off and go where the wind would blow it. It wasn't a safe situation, sitting under a pole with a heavy speaker attached that could land on my head any minute. Not to mention the wild animals outside – bears, wolves, cougars - that are long extinct in Holland. There were a lot of reasons to be afraid and I was.

holland_stormBut one particular deep fear was absent and I felt relief from it. I felt lighter. After a few seconds it hit me. However hard the wind would blow and no matter how much rain would pour down, the water wouldn't come. High up in the Rockies there are no floods! I suddenly saw how a deep fear, or to say more accurately, a deep alertness, is always in my awareness. I feel it when it's raining especially hard in Holland and a storm is coming up. It's not terror or fear, it's more a feeling of alertness. Alert to what I know has happened time and time again: cold dark water breaking through the dikes and washing our villages away. Only if you were lucky would you get to the attic or roof and wait for the water to withdraw. I see now how these images imprint a healthy awareness of our own vulnerability. Until now I didn't notice the ebb and flow of this deep awareness and alertness in reaction to the weather, a pattern imprinted in the national psyche.

Coming home again– my first flood

help_themThat insight in the tent in Colorado was the moment that I acknowledged that 'water' actually plays a bigger part of the Dutch psyche and culture than I was aware of. It strengthened when I was back home again and the rain was pouring down just like it was during that stormy night in Colorado. I was on my bicycle working myself through the whipping rain to my little house in the old city centre of Amsterdam. It was night when I arrived home and found a growing puddle in front of my door. And more was coming. The drain was jammed and it didn't look like the storm was ending soon either. A good 20 cm high water column had already formed an impressive lake in front of my neighbour’s door.

I actually felt a strange mix of excitement and relief: finally I got to act on my constant alertness in times of bad weather. I could fight the familiar enemy that now had come to visit my house. My alarmed neighbours hurried outside in their nightgowns (I live in a medieval 'hofje' with 15 other women), carrying buckets, towels, sandbags. (Sandbags? Yes, we realized we keep sandbags in the bicycle shed). We didn't need to say much, there was an immediate camaraderie and a natural working together to get the water out and the pump fixed. It felt very... natural. The maintance man hurried to help and fix the pump, and he sat for hours under his umbrella on watch beside it to makes sure it would keep working. He had a seriousness within him that seemed inherited from those who guard the dike and with that guard the lives of many living behind it.

Picture_6

Wow... suddenly the things I read about my culture, but never really believed, came to life. I had read that the common responsibility to maintain the dikes had made the early Dutch work together, and had helped create the consensus-type of decision making we’re now famous for. Now I was actually experiencing this part of culture as it acted through me. We're all needed when the storm comes, if one person doesn't maintain their part of the dike we’ll all perish. So we'll keep on talking with each other until everyone agrees and cooperates. We call this 'polderen', the word used to describe pieces of land claimed from the sea... I've heard that our negative take on life and work ethic relates to this deep fear of the water. There's always a dyke or something that can be strengthened, fixed. We have to keep searching for what's wrong. Have to keep working because one time the big storm will come. No time to relax, to have parties, to think about nice banquets (ever heard of the famous Dutch kitchen? No? Well.. you shouldn't be surprised anymore!). dijkwerkersAnd it's true, I experience it in myself. I don't trust the bright skies, good weather doesn't last forever: if things go well for too long a tension builds up. It can't be safe! It's the very same experience when I am lying in bed and it's raining, slightly tense and thinking I've been living too carelessly. That I should've been working on something as if my life depends on it.

The water is ruling our perspective on life in general and has influenced our culture in deeper ways than we would think. Even when it's been over 50 years since the last big flood, these cultural structures are built over centuries and have become such a part of our way of looking at life that they don't need actual floods to strengthen them anymore. The water has, so to say, submerged itself in culture.

Seeing oneself as product of geography and culture

Looking back to my experience I‘m amazed at how thick my cultural lens is. How hard it is for me to see how the place I've grown up in and my culture I am part of shape the way I look at life. As a human geographer I've learned that we all use perspectives and see the world through a lens (re)created in culture, we make meaning of what happens around us in a way that it fits our set of cultural beliefs. It’s easy to study other cultures and see how this is true. But trying to understand my own cultural blindspots and biases means taking the position of observer and the subject being studied at the same time. And that is not easy. The things I think are normal - beliefs about the world, social and moral shoulds and shouldn’ts – are so hard to see because of just that, I think they’re normal.

Picture_7Only when in contact with other cultures – as with the American tourists- or in actually leaving one’s country and culture there is there some space, some objectivity about yourself and the cultural lens we are wearing. Only then I am forced to think again about things I take as 'normal'. But letting go of the whole mental framework alltogether and seeing the world as it is objectively, without any lens or any cultural distortion seems close to impossible. And a bit scary as the world itself seems to crumble. The only moments I've had perceiving my surroundings without any lens or value distinctions is in deep meditation, when I let go of all the ideas and thoughts of what the world is. And I think that’s the closest place to objectivity a human being can get.

Go explore for yourself

The main point I want to make in this article is that the way we see the world, the way we feel, is in more ways influenced by the geographical place that we grow up than we might think. And when realizing this, you may start to feel more connected to the world and your country than you once were. It can bring you home in a certain way, not separated anymore from that which has created you and your worldview – it's your own culture.

So I invite you to get out of your own comfort zone, your own country and culture and see what happens. I bet you're much more your culture than you're aware of. Read about your national history and see how your own experience falls together with the history of your country and its geographies. I’m curious what you'll find – take North America as an example:

NA_geoI’ve always wondered how culture was formed in the New World. The European settlers were desperate individuals, leaving their families and home country behind to settle in a vast open space with no one around to depend on. They fought wolves, bisons, and bears - animals almost extinct in the old world, but still ruling the woods of America. They fought Natives and lived an often lonely life in the large woods or on the endless plains. But they were free. Renagades, fortune seekers, criminals and people with faiths clashing with European culture. Into the wild. What does this collective experience in the New World with its huge mountain ranges, forests and plains do to someone who came from a poverty stricken Irish village, living according to strict societal rules enforced by an established elite? What culture emerges when more and more immigrants come join you in the new land?

I hope you'll share with me what you find!!

Latest from Tineke de Boer

Related items

Join the Discussion

Commenting Policy

Beams and Struts employs commenting guidelines that we expect all readers to bear in mind when commenting at the site. Please take a moment to read them before posting - Beams and Struts Commenting Policy

18 comments

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Thursday, 05 January 2012 19:31 posted by TJ Dawe

    Carl Jung had a quote (which I can't find right now) to the effect of having a mentality very much affected by living dwarfed by the Swiss mountains, and he said that mentality was common to his countrymen, and explained the famous Swiss neutrality, that sense of being a troglodyte, not important in world affairs, with no interest in taking over the world, but more concerned with keeping to themselves. I'm probably bungling this quote in my memory, but this article brought it to mind.

    This concept has to filter through something for any Canadian or American - namely the fact that our political borders go from east to west, but our culture goes from north to south. Having been born and raised in Vancouver, and still living here, I'm part of a geographical region that includes Vancouver Island, Seattle, Portland and Northern California: northwest coniferous rain-forest. Plenty of rain. Hardly any snow. Temperate weather, all year round. Plenty of outdoor activity, which often usurps the impulse for an intellectual or cultural life.

    But politically there's a connection to the rest of Canada, and the other geographical regions breed their own mentalities: the prairies, the Canadian Shield, the golden horseshoe (the densely populated area of Southern Ontario), the Maritimes, Newfoundland, the North.

    There's also the cultural tug of war between English and French Canada.

    But we all share certain things, not the least of which is the sense of not really being that important in world affairs, of being overshadowed by the US, and resenting the US for it, and trumpeting our differences whenever possible, but also admiring the US tremendously, and turning to them for most of our music, TV, movies, and arts generally.

    So to bring it back to Vancouver, I can most certainly see the influence of the geography on my mentality in the fact that I'm inclined to bike or walk to get to wherever I need to go, and I'm not intimidated by the frequent rain. I orient myself with the mountains which form the city's northern skyline. I escape to a cabin in the woods whenever I can, and listen to the rain falling on the A-frame roof. And I feel separate from the rest of Canada, given that they're all bundling up against a brutal snow and slush filled winter, which I don't have to endure. I'd much rather vacation in Seattle or Portland than Calgary or Hamilton.

    But contrary to the geographical prompting, I'm much more interested in staying inside and reading or writing or listening to music or watching movies than in skiing, windsurfing or paddling as part of a dragon-boat team.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Thursday, 05 January 2012 22:50 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Dear TJ, thanks so much for sharing your cultural experience! I think it is very interesting how you show that the geography and climate of the Westcoast invites people to do outdoor activities and as a result a whole outdoor culture has formed. I can speak to that after spending a few days on beautiful Vancouver Island. Give me a log cabin and a pair of sturdy hiking boots and I won't need much more to be pretty content.

    The vastness and climatological & geographical variety of the country itself is breathtaking to me, it makes sense that culture runs north to south as the mind has a hard time identifying with such a huge country (but coming from a very small country its hard for me to tell). Vancouver and Seattle may share more similarities in climate & culture than Vancouver and Ottawa in Quebec. Proximity may be more important sometimes than political borders of a nation state!

    One point you bring up I find very interesting: the relationship between Canada and the US. I'd like to share the experience I had spending New years eve in Vancouver. We we're watching the countdown on television and it took me a few moments before realizing I was watching Times Square and listening to American celebs talking. I realized it was a rerun, because of the time difference between the US and Canada. That made it feel even further away from the place & people surrounding me. What I saw on TV didn't match my direct experience, while such a collective event should do just that.

    It's just an example of the close relationship between the US and Canada where it's normal to rely on US media. And at the same time hating it because of the cultural differences. It's different from Europe, where each nationstate has a solid sense of national identity - the Dutch and Belgians theoretically could be watching the same countdown broadcast, but it just wouldn't even cross our mind. I want to see Dam square in Amsterdam, with our national anchorman speaking, having a collective experience with my countrymen. So to see New York where I would've expected Ottawa was confusing to me.

    There is probably much more to explore here and I am grateful for this cultural exchange!

  • Comment Link Marilyn Hamilton Friday, 06 January 2012 00:59 posted by Marilyn Hamilton

    Hi Tineke
    As a Canadian who has visited NL many times in the last 2 years, I am MOST appreciative of the deep wisdom and science of water that the Dutch have mastered. As the climate talks started to peak before COP15, it came to me (as I was flying into Amsterdam) that the Dutch have a mission to teach the rest of the world how to work with H2O. I even fantasize that they will move beyond saving much of their old infrastructure by eventually floating their cities. The Life Conditions in NL have triggered intelligences we all need now. Thanks for recognizing has deeply encoded they are in your whole being!! (written by a "stubble jumper" who originally haled from Saskatchewan, which was in dinosaur time a massive inland sea :-))

  • Comment Link Anne-Claire (Amsterdam) Friday, 06 January 2012 09:09 posted by Anne-Claire (Amsterdam)

    dear Tineke,
    What a timing, posting this article, with the storm hitting our country and risk of flouds!
    When watching the 8 o'clock news yesterday, about the storm, rising water, evacuation of people and all the technical masterpieces put into action to protect our little country from the high water, I had ofcourse the 1953-flouds in mind and all our technical inventions to never make it happen again (thousands of people died). They even showed a technique that only exists in one place in the Netherlands, the socalled "Balgstuw", an inflatable rubber dam. Have a look at this animation :-) http://youtu.be/0hOpFAzjWGg.
    As a historian and 'interculturalist' I have thought a lot about our lens and the influence of your surroundings on your world view. But I never thought so specifically about the influence of the water (mabe because I lived most of the time above sea level and during my high school years even on a "Dutch mountain", 120 meters high, in the south east). Thank you for that!

  • Comment Link TJ Dawe Friday, 06 January 2012 17:28 posted by TJ Dawe

    Tineke - you're not the only one who has a hard time identifying with such a huge country. Canada's vastness, as well as its east-west sprawl are massive barriers to establishing any kind of national culture. I think North America would be much more culturally vibrant if it consisted of a dozen or so countries, or maybe twenty, rather than three.

    In the case of Canada there's also a relatively small population, given the landmass. So there's a much smaller market for artists, less funding for film and TV, and many Canadian artists move to the US. Some do quite well, others toil and starve, but their talents aren't used to further any kind of living Canadian culture. But what ends up happening is that one of the few things that immediately unifies Canadians is a knowledge and pride of every ex-pat Canadian artist who's made it big in the States. Not that that cultivates much of a desire to support the ones who still live and work here...

    Quebec has a vibrant culture, having its own language, and a great pride in its history and difference.

    Newfoundland has a vibrant culture, being an island, and having only joined Canada comparatively recently (1949). Again, there's a great pride in its traditions.

    Vancouver and Vancouver Island have strong outdoors cultures, and plenty of people attracted to the outdoor life move here, but usually retain a sense of being wherever they're originally from, and never stop complaining about the rain.

    I used to watch that exact New Year's Eve broadcast from Times Square growing up. Seemed the most natural thing in the world. In fact, I grew up with an association that everything interesting happened in the US. A live New Year Eve's broadcast from Ottawa would have seemed unimaginably lame.

    Similarly, I'd say not one in a hundred Canadians has ever watched a Canadian film. But there's a Canadian comedian - Rick Mercer - who for years did a TV segment called "Talking to Americans" where he'd go to Harvard, or talk to the governor of Oklahoma, or just people on the street in any US city, and feed them ridiculous misinformation about Canada with a straight face, and get them to repeat it to the camera. Canadians laugh and laugh and this, and if you bring this topic up at a party, everyone will be salivating waiting to describe a favourite "Taking to Americans" segment.

  • Comment Link Chris Dierkes Friday, 06 January 2012 19:24 posted by Chris Dierkes

    Tineke,

    Great piece. As someone whose a transplant to the West Coast, who spent his life growing up in the Midwest US and then living on the East Coast, I still in many ways don't really feel like I fit in around here. There's definitely a West Coast vibe or persona which I don't have. Place is definitely part of it.

    I once heard an aboriginal person describe how he went to another place from where he originated. He said he didn't know the trees. I had never thought of it like that before but that really made sense to me. I've lived here now almost 6 years and I'm still not sure I know the trees. They are taller, thinner, greener than the ones I'm used to.

    Politically and socially I fit in better here than where I grew up but geographically not really. e.g. I'm not really an outdoorsy adventurist kinda guy.

    As much as I aesthetically marvel at the mountains and the ocean, my being is more used to (and strangely comfortable with) wide open spaces, flat horizons, maybe a few rolling hills here and there, leaves changing color in the fall, the bareness of a midwestern winter.

    Like I said, great piece.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Friday, 06 January 2012 22:33 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Dear Marilyn, I hope you enjoyed this article and I am very happy to give you an inside view on life behind the dikes! Fighting the water is indeed in our blood... we already have floating houses and a long time we were thinking about placing Schiphol airport (the one you probably visited on your trip to Holland!) on a huge artificial island in the sea.

    Some of the national technical inventions strike me with awe. Please check out the movie Anne-Claire posted in her comment, it shows an ingenious inflatable dam. It's a very enjoyable video. Today the current floods in the Netherlands were on the news again and professor Han Vrijling explained the technologies used to shield us from a flood. You may find it interesting to browse through his research: http://bit.ly/ADlQPO

    Anne-Claire, thanks for posting the 'balgstuw'! I never knew it existed... it shows the creativity that is released when we need to overcome a challenge! And I can definitely relate to 'overlooking' the importance of water in our cultural experience. It may even seem too obvious or normal maybe? Even though we are trained to look for cultural lenses it's hard to see our own!

    TJ, you give some valuable insights on what its like to live in a scarcely populated country, thank you for that! It makes sense that it's hard to keep a culture together and alive when you are mostly living in more or less secluded areas with subcultures emerging. Quebec is quite distinct and I know the French influence brings a strong sense of nationalism and pride... not easy to connect with if you aren't from Quebec probably?

    New Years from Ottawa lame! Probably because all the Canadian celebs moved down South :-). Just kidding. I find this an interesting point though as our national countdown from Dam Square can definitely be called lame too, but I still wouldn't easily trade it for the German countdown, our big brother. In this respect it is so good to see Canadian national pride grow around events like the Olympic Wintergames, showing what your made from!

    Chris, happy to hear you like the article and love reading your experience!! You don't know the trees, that's a great description of an experience that a lot of us may have had. It seems that on a deeper level you are tuned to your environment - the smells, feels and anchorpoints (hills or flatland, rivers or sanddunes?). Mountains make me feel confined, wide open spaces give me a sense of space and overview. Incredible! Great exploring this topic together, thanks!

  • Comment Link Elizabeth Debold Sunday, 08 January 2012 05:34 posted by Elizabeth Debold

    Nice job, Tineke! It's great to see how one's deeper biases and almost instinctive responses can be seen through. The ground of meditation does give you a place prior to everything through which to see these deep self structures that are so "normal" to us that we don't question them at all.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Sunday, 08 January 2012 14:41 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Thank you Elizabeth! And yes it's amazing to experience how there are so much more deeper layers to our (cultural) experience. Layers that I probably wouldn't have discovered without meditation, the practice of letting all my ideas and worldviews go.

  • Comment Link Peter Simmons Sunday, 08 January 2012 17:56 posted by Peter Simmons

    I would have to agree with this article. I grew up in Kingston Jamaica, and while eJamaican culture is different than Vancouver, both places are remarkably similar in the physical geography of mountains, narrow flat area and ocean. I lived in Ontario for 7 years and hated it for many reasons, primarily the lack of mountains and green in the winter. When I went to Japan in the 90s, I went for an interview to teach English about an hour north of Tokyo. 10 minutes before the train reached the town, I saw the mountains and had a overwhelming sense of "home", as strange as it seems for all the cultural differences.
    I realized then that I had to live in a place with a view of the mountains.
    To take this further, I would also add that the geography affects us in other ways. I find that people in Vancouver are not as attached to reshaping the land or having dominion over the land as people who live in the flatter parts of North America. Geography in your face all the time here is likely the reason the environmental movement is so strong here. Conversely when I traveled in Europe I was struck by "history in your face all the time", which made me realize why people seemed to bring up the past a lot or referred to periods when their country was great even if it was many centuries earlier. There seems to be a connection to history, which I don't sense in North America especially in BC.

  • Comment Link Ronnit Bendavid-Val Monday, 09 January 2012 02:17 posted by Ronnit Bendavid-Val

    This was fascinating to read, Tineke. I am very struck by your description of sitting in the meditation tent in Colorado, and recognizing that despite the extreme weather you were suddenly free of a deep fear (or "awareness") that you hadn't even realized was a fundamental lens you lived life through, until that moment. It's very powerful to see something like that, and especially how you recognized it to be a result of the culture you grew up in. It raises the question of what other kinds of un-seen fears exist in each of us that are undercurrents to our personalities - for example, as a Jew I am home to a whole host of fears that are a real lens through which I've always related to life. These fears developed for very real historical reasons, as did your awareness of water, but if unseen they define my worldview in ways that inhibit any new potential I could bring in today's world. It's very compelling to free ourselves more and more from cultural impacts on our psyche and worldview, and then discover who we can be from there.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Monday, 09 January 2012 21:14 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Hi Peter, I love your insights that you got through traveling, sounds like you are very aware of what's happening when you change environment! I do recognize the feeling of home when I see the see for example. It's a breath of fresh air to me. It's interesting to think about what makes us want to transform and 'manage' our environment. Does it look untamable (like the mountains around Vancouver) or does it invite planning, managing and building roads through it, like many lush flatlands do? And YES history in your face in Europe! It adds a certain weight to our experience here. A weight that is not there in the 'New World'. Ways of doing & being, consciousness of ages materialized in the built environment. Totally agree! And yet I see that in Europe this weight shouldn't keep us from creating a new space and see transformation as a real possibility. Nor does it mean that in the US and Canada one can't plan cities thoughtfully, having the coming centuries in mind.

    Dear Ronnit, thank you for underlining the importance of being aware and free from your cultural lens: to be free to act in the world, to be able to make informed choices and create a liberated new culture. You say that there are all kinds of unseen fears that exist in us and I see how seemingly 'practical' fears like fear of water in this case, can actually develop into a perspective to life itself as a whole. Its absolutely liberating to see a certain emotional relation to life, a perspective as something that comes second, as a layer that I can become more and more aware of and freed from. Without denying or losing my Dutch culture in any way - embracing the great capacities for watermanagement for example!

  • Comment Link Trevor Malkinson Tuesday, 10 January 2012 19:40 posted by Trevor Malkinson

    Tineke, thanks for the thought provoking article. For me, I'm very much a sea guy, having grown up on it for my whole life (on Vancouver Island, west coast of Canada). I've noticed that I've missed it while being away traveling, and how much I enjoy it and feel at home sitting beside it's vast expanse when I return to it.

    I've also noticed how people are often really attracted to living as adults where they grew up. Must be something very old going on there, although we have extensive nomadic heritage in our ancient ancestors too, so I don't know how or where that fits. I left my hometown of Victoria because eventually I found it too small and stagnant, but damn if I don't feel pulled to move back there every time I visit. It's a strange sensation. I was on the train to LA once and a woman told me something that might be total nonsense, but it still struck me somehow. We were talking about the huge Mexican influence/population in California (which is ever growing), and she theorized that it was because Mexicans were returning to their homeland that had been taken from them. But she meant that this was largely an unconscious process, it was a like a cultural tractor beam in the DNA so to speak; a mass return to the ancient homeland. Hard to say if that's at all true, but something about that resonated enough that it stuck with me.

    What's been interesting for me about this article is that when I first read it I really appreciated (and still do) the dimension of becoming untangled/liberated from our cultural conditioning with an awareness such as the one you so nicely offer from your experience. However, as I've read the comments I've also come to see how this discussion really (re)connects us to place too, in a positive way. In an post/modern era of up-rootedness, social dislocation, extensive travel and immigration etc., perhaps an important part of the post-postmodern age is a return to being rooted in place, and from this article and the comments it seems to me that if we become aware of it, this is something that actually comes quite naturally to us. A deep rooted connection to place seems to be coming out in many of the comments, and I'm wondering if there's also not a very rich and healthy dimension to this 'conditioning'.

    This article has inspired me to go back and revisit a few essays by the philosopher Martin Heidegger. He was very critical of our up-rootedness in the modern era, and wrote a lot about 'dwelling on the earth', and various other themes of a grounded embodied connection to place, earth and sky [http://bit.ly/yxxraD]. Given the comments on this article, it seems to me that this reconnection might be easier/closer than we think.

    Lastly, it was only about two weeks before I read this article that I learned about the historical controversy in the field of geography around the effects (or non-effects) of the environment and local geography on culture. It was in this Entitled Opinions podcast called The Discipline of Geography (Episode 4):

    http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/entitled-opinions-about-life/id81415836

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_determinism

    I guess some people took it too far in the early 20th century and then it was on the outs for many years. Apparently Jared Diamond's works have enabled the partial truth is this perspective to be allowed back on the table again. All of which I know you're aware of Tineke, being a geographer and all, but I was just really excited to read such a stellar example of this perspective in your piece so shortly after learning about this field. Thanks again for the article, very eye opening.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Wednesday, 11 January 2012 21:29 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Dear Trevor, thank you so much for your rich and thoughtfully composed reaction to my article! I am going to check out the Heidegger article first before responding in full to your comments ad get back to you shortly!

  • Comment Link Trevor Malkinson Wednesday, 11 January 2012 21:58 posted by Trevor Malkinson

    Cool Tineke, that sounds good, but let me just say that I don't want to get too bogged down in Heidegger. I mention him for two reasons; one is because I was just relaying that this article truly does make me want to review his work on rootedness and dwelling and related concepts; the thoughts of many here told me that our (re)connection to the these things is probably much closer than we think. (and the article I linked to I found very quickly; I just didn't want to mention him without some sort of further explanation of his ideas. I'm sure there's better introductions to his ideas than that one).

    Secondly, as I said, he was a great critic of how untethered we've become in the modern world from place and the earth. And as I have been reading the comment section unfolding, a critical part of myself started to arise with reference to all this 'de-conditioning' from our culture and place etc. Putting Heidegger aside, perhaps you can just speak to my concerns that this emphasis on dis-embedding from the conditioning of the geography we grew up in might ALSO dis-connect us from the geography we grew up in. Maybe this is not an either/or, and there's a way we can re-embed with place in a richer more conscious way once we've gone through this process of self-reflection.

    I worry that when Elizabeth talks about seeing through our "deeper biases and almost instinctive responses"- a worthy process in so many ways, getting beyond the social construction etc. that the postmodern mind discovered- that we're not also severing ourselves from real, important, rich 'instinctual' connections to to the land and earth, from the biophilia that is so important to humans (and has been so lost in the modern West).

    Like I said, maybe there's a re-integration beyond the necessary step of separation/dis-embedding, but I just wanted to presence that concern here. Hope some of that makes sense, thanks for the discussion.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Thursday, 12 January 2012 22:20 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Dear Trevor, thank you for your honest and open comment! I can share my own experience here when it comes to geography and culture and the question whether or not we're separating ourselves from reality when trying to get objectivity on our cultural lens. I discovered that I liked some parts of being DUtch and hated other parts. I recognized that I AM culture, all that is around me is very alive in me. And that's a realization that brings me back to earth right away.

    I think it has to do with letting go of the forced idea that we are all the same and the tension that comes with the discovery that this is not the case. And with the idea that I am a unique individual with my own set of beliefs and problems, but that I actually share them with my fellow countrymen. That knowledge creates a lot of space and a connectedness to others. Being able to see cultural beliefs in me makes it possible to really take responsibility for being Dutch, because I know what it means. To be aware of the great things our culture has to offer. And where I can learn from other cultures how we can get out of belief systems that just doesn't work anymore. It makes me more aware of being Dutch, more comfortable and yes, more proud because I can see the unique qualities & quirks of my own culture and recognizing them in myself.

    Being culturally conditioned is not bad. Heck no, its the best invention ever! Civilization wouldn't be possible without it. But we can learn to chose our responses when we are aware of the fact that we may have cultural blind spots and preferences that may no be connected to reality anymore. And that we may have created more skill in other areas of life, like the dyke building Dutch for example. With that knowledge we can help each other see and learn more.

    I recognize the thought that gaining objectivity and taking distance from our own experience sounds like something 'cold' and separated. That was my first reaction and fear before I really tried to do it. But every time I discover a new thing in myself that is a result of for example my age, gender or nationality, something sinks deeper in me. Where I was confused before (why do I feel this way?) I relax in the space that opens up after recognizing that it's a result of a certain way I've been brought up to see the world. It is not my fault, there is nothing wrong with me. It makes sense, I am the result of a culture and now that I see it. Culture & I fall together, while I also see that I am more than just culture. Funny, isn't it? And it is the same effect that comes from hearing that I share traits with my grandmother. It connects you to other people and you found the reason why.

    It's subtle stuff and it's not easy getting it on paper. I do hope what I wrote translates though! Very curious about your thoughts!

  • Comment Link Trevor Malkinson Tuesday, 17 January 2012 00:17 posted by Trevor Malkinson

    Tineke, thanks, to use Canadian parlance, that's a heck of an answer.

    I appreciate you giving voice to how this de-conditioning can also open up spaces of further depth with culture and others (and Earth/place too, although we haven't really explored that yet). Obviously, given my criticisms above, I think this is important to also add this to the first movement of awareness/de-conditioning. So I appreciate when you say-

    "...I actually share them with my fellow countrymen. That knowledge creates a lot of space and a connectedness to others".

    Here's where we can start to recognize- through your subtle phenomenological descriptions- where and how this practice can simultaneously deepen human community and our sense of place while it is also freeing us from so many ingrained reactions. "subtle stuff" indeed as you say, but thanks again for the great example in this piece and in this discussion here.

  • Comment Link Tineke de Boer Tuesday, 17 January 2012 09:18 posted by Tineke de Boer

    Roger that!!! Great to think about this together, so thanks for your comments! It makes us both think deeper and examine our own experience and understanding.

Login to post comments

Search Beams

Most Popular Discussions