Here's a recent clip of Bill Maher talking about The Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear. He criticizes the rally for not "being about something", and for not being robust enough in expressing its values. I think he makes some important points that will push the liberal/progressive conversation further. Do I think his critique nullifies my recent claim on Bits & Piecesthat the rally was a success? Not really. Maher also says that, "Getting over 200,000 people to a liberal rally is a great achievement, it gave me hope". This was exactly the sort of thing I was referring to when I viewed the rally as a cultural success. Maher was at some level taken aback and inspired by what he saw. He also wants to see something further and stronger from the progressive movement. Great, that'll be for the next rally then, and hopefully Bill will be there taking part in such a push.
I think it's important to be sensitive to the ecology of social movements, the myriad ways in which they grow, multiply, amplify and unfold. Any mass social-political flowering- whether it be the civil rights actions of the 1960s or the WTO demonstrations in Seattle, Genoa and beyond- has behind it countless previous encounters and collaborations between humans at multiple levels of intensity and number. I'm suspicious of the progressive tendency to always see the cup as half empty ("this rally didn't do anything"). This perfectionist tendency can be debilitating, and it can also be a subtle if unconscious way for us to excuse ourselves from the responsibility of actively shaping the world around us. Better to just get out there and smash bodies together, create sparks, form new creations of human assembly and action. And to remember, as Jack Kerouac once put it, that walking on water isn't built in a day.